Mutual Funds- Are They Worth Your While? Part Two
In part one of this series, I wrote about some of the pros and cons of mutual funds. I mentioned that there are numerous expenses that come with investing in a mutual fund, including the high price of management fees and brokerage fees that come with frequent trading. However, the fund manager is bound by a responsibility to find the best deals on commission for you that she or he can. Also, the expertise of a fund manager can be quite helpful for beginners when they start to invest.
Also, a number of mutual funds offer more than one class of shares. The way it works is like this: every class invests in the same pool of securities and the investment objectives and policies are the same. But, every class has different shareholder services and distribution arrangements for different fees and expenses. So, if you pay more money for a higher class of share, you can expect different services, and better performance out of the mutual fund. This multi-class structure gives investors the capacity to pick their own fee that fits their investment goals best.
Even though all of these aspects of mutual funds are pros, critics return to the high cost of mutual funds as a big con. They are also quick to point out that the efficiency of mutual funds lack when compared to a simple index fund. An index fund will invest in companies that are part of major stock or bond indexes and therefore attempts to profit from simply riding the market trends, while funds that are run by a manager try to outperform a relevant index through advanced stock picking techniques.
The assets of an index fund are geared to closely match the performance of a particular published index that shows positive trends. Because there will be little changes associated with a stock index, an index fund manager performs less trades than an active fund manager. Due to this fact, the management fee will be much less, and because there are less trades, there will be lower trading expenses. In fact, mutual funds have fees that are usually four times as much as those charged by index funds.
Also, evidence proves that mutual funds typically don't, in fact beat the market, and actually under-perform other portfolios with similar characteristics. One study illustrated that almost 1500 United States mutual funds underperformed the market in about half of the years between 1962 and 1992. What's more, analysis shows that funds that did well in the past aren't able to beat the market again in the future. And maybe what is worst is that even if your manager proves to be a dud, and your mutual fund doesn't do well, you will be stuck with a premium in fees - and often a large tax bill. Ultimately, it is a decision you should make after long thought and weighing all of the pros and cons, and not one that you should take lightly if your money is important to you.
Article Source: FxTradingStock.com
About the Author
Mallory Megan works for Rapid Recovery Solution and writes articles on medical collection agencies.
by: Mallory Megan
Total views: 30
Word Count: 507
Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2010
Publish/Share this article
To use this article on your site click here to get the HTML code
Rating: Not yet rated
Login to vote
Related Articles
How to Invest in 2011 and Beyond Without a ClueWhat Is Forex Trading?
Quick Way To Trade In Shares
ATM Calendar Spreads, Are You Aware Of The Hidden Gotchas?
Emini Day Trading Requirements
The Coming Death Of The Dollar
Fantastic Fundraising Suggestions
Winning Big In The Share Market
